|
Buy Orosur Mining* at 24.25p
Argues Tom
Winnifrith of t1ps.com
Penny
share Orosur Mining* has a track record of non
delivery
It's management's priorities are not (I think)
correct
And Evil has been a fan (losing money) for
years....But
Its assets are impressive, it has cash and is
profitable
The time to buy is when the good qualities are
obscured by bad sentiment
That time is now.....
Orusur is a buy at 24.5p and at up to 30p with a 1
year target share price of 50p.
I start
with 2 confessions about this free share tip. One: we
own this TSX and AIM listed stock in the SF t1ps Gold
Fund already. Two: As an activist shareholder I am
ready to push other companies into "having a go at
Orosur" (OMI) since I am not 100% convinced that the
current management will deliver as much value as they
should, as quickly as they should. I suppose a third
confession is in order. Evil has been banging on
about this company (formerly known as Uruguay
Minerals) for years and the stock has gone nowhere.
But the old boy is correct now and again and having
chatted on Friday about what the assets are really
worth I think that he is correct. The issue is when
and how value will be delivered. But the asset
backing is undeniable and I suspect that one way or
t'other it is about to be realised.
20 new tips a year for as little as
GBP73
T1ps.com offers 20 new meticulously
researched tips a year plus frequent
updates on all tipped stocks.
To get all of these for just GBP73 by
direct debit or GBP87.60 by credit/debit
card, join
t1ps.com now.
|
The
Assets
Let's start at the very beginning. It's a very good
place to start. The company has c$9m of net cash and
has farmed out its base metals assets to some
Australian iron company (Gladiator) which, even in a
firesale, must be worth $6million. So lets call that
cash and cash equivalents of GBP10 million.
The producing asset is the San Gregorio mine complex
in Uruguay. This consists of two pits (San Gregorio
and Arenal). In 2009 they produced 70,147 oz of gold
at grades of 1.73g/t. But output is declining and
this year it will be just 57,500 oz at a grade of
1.25g/t meaning cash costs will be c$900 oz. But...
if Orosur spends $10 million ( which we know it has)
it can open up Arenal Deeps and Cawky and I reckon
that we will then see output at 75,000 oz for 4 years
at a cash cost of $600 oz. Prudently we allow a $20
million charge in year 4 to close down the mine.
Management is farting about, talking of how it will
seek funding to open Arenal Deeps (hell's teeth it
has the cash) and opening in Q1 2011. Cawky and I
would go for bust and open it asap. However even the
existing mine should generate enough cash to just
about cover PLC costs.
Then we have the development assets. Earlier this
year Orosur bought a TSX listed company Fortune
Valley which brings two Chilean assets Pantanillo and
Anillo. I will ignore the latter for the time being
and even the former cannot be said to have a proven
resource. But historic drilling (17,000 metres of it)
at the former prospect indicated a gold resource of
2.2 million ounces. We believe that a mine here could
be developed for $100 million.
|
Click for Full Charting facilities from
ShareCrazy.com
|
|
The
Management
The Board owns a pathetic number of shares in Orosur.
Share options do not count as a sign of commitment.
Cawky and I have both put it pretty strongly to the
company that it is no good the management bleating
about how cheap the shares are if they do not buy
themselves in the market. I hope that the message has
got through. The main man is CEO David Fowler who is
more credible than most mining CEOs running companies
of this size. But I am afraid that is rather like
saying that Cawky would win a 100 metre sprint if the
rest of the field were clinically obsese, blind, one
legged three year olds.
The Fowler strategy is to secure funding and to
slowly bring Arenal Deeps into production while at
the same time continuing work in Chile. EK and I
would do nothing in Chile until Christmas so chuck
everything at Arenal, avoid dilution and pretty
quickly have a company chucking of $50 million per
annum in operational cashflow. It is a nuance but I
think an important one. We push our case.
|
*The value of investments can go down as well
as up. Past performance is no guarantee of
future success. Investing in equities can
lose you part or all of your capital. The
tips given here are of necessity, general.
They cannot relate to the individual
circumstances of investors. Anyone
considering following the recommendations
contained here should seek independent
advice. Investments in smaller company
shares, by their nature, can be relatively
illiquid and thus hard to trade. And that
makes such investments more of a high risk
than larger company shares.
|
Valuation
Let us assume that Orosur follows the suggestions of
myself and Evil. All liquid assets are realised and
used to bring Arenal Deeps onstream What is it worth?
Let us assume that after PLC costs it leaves Orosur
with GBP40 million free cashflow for each of the next
three years and $10 million in year four
(incidentally minelife could be longer but I am being
cautious). Discount that back at 10% and you are
still left with c$100 million ( call that GBP60
million).
That $100 million would incidentally provide the
cashflow to develop Pantanillo without debt finance.
But let us assume that the Chilean asset was sold.
What would it fetch? In the current climate surely
$25 oz is not extreme for a mine which, it appears ,
could produce at low cost 200,000 oz per annum for
more than a decade.. That implies a valuation of $55
million. Let's call it GBP36 million. So we have a
valuation of GBP96 million and there are 65 million
shares in issue which equates to 148p per
share.
However there are risks. South America is an odd
place to do business. Orosur has a track record of
non delivery. And you have to worry that Fowler may
decide to issue shares at some stage even though he
does not need to. Hence I will go with a target price
of 50p which I will only revise if this company
starts to deliver. But will it get the chance? There
are other AIM and TSX listed companies operating in
South America whose management really are very good
(Minera springs to mind). I would suggest that if
Minera offered 50p per share in paper then most
investors would bit its hand off. It would thus be
paying GBP32 million but could immediately strip out
corporate costs so would get its money back in just
one year from the expanded operations in Uruguay.
Years 2, 3 and 4 plus the Chilean potential would be
in for free. If I were running Orosur I'd be pretty
panicked about the threat of a hostile offer and
would be doing my utmost to bring Arenal Deeps
onstream and to buy shares pa in the market without
delay. Let us see how the management reacts to this
article. For the rest of thus this is a win win.
Either Orosur delivers or a bid is inevitable. The
stance is buy at 24.25p and at up to 30p with an
initial target price of 50p
*The SF t1ps Smaller Companies Gold Fund owns
shares in this company. For more details on the fund
- in which my SIPP will be buying more units tomorrow
- email
goldfund@t1ps.com or visit www.t1psim.com
Key Data
EPIC: OMI
Market: AIM
Spread: 24p
- 24.5p (2.04%)
Tom
Winnifrith edits t1ps.com where he publishes 20 t1ps a
year with a constant stream of updates and there will
be 9 CEO webcasts exclusively on the site next week.
T1ps also plays home to bear raider Evil Knievil. For
one year's access for as little as GBP73 click
HERE
|