AIM
listed Hambledon Mining is on a roll. An upbeat
AGM statement was followed by record quarterly
production numbers. However, the company has
had a history of disappointing investors by
missing production targets at its flagship
Sekisovskoye project in Kazakhstan for a number
of reasons. The rating of the shares reflects,
we believe, its past record rather than its
current performance or future potential. With
net cash - and generating cash - we believe
that output in calendar 2010 will increase from
21,000 ounces of gold equivalent to 26,000
ounces but that within three years output could
- without the need for Hambledon to secure
external finance - reach 100,000 oz of gold
equivalent per annum with cash costs falling
during the period from $664 to $500 oz.
If
this target is reached, the cost base at the
100% owned Sekisovskoye operation means that
Hambledon could at current gold prices be
generating pre-tax profits of up to GBP50
million per annum. At 6.375p the market
capitalisation is just GBP32.9 million which
suggests that investors are still focusing on
past non-delivery rather than the enormous
future potential. We believe that this is
mistaken and, at 6.125p our stance is
buy with a price target of
16.8p - just three times forecast 2012 earnings
per share.
Forecast Table
|
Year to 31 December
|
Output
(oz Au eq.)
|
Sales
(GBP million)
|
Pre-Tax Profit** (GBP million)
|
Earnings Per Share** (p)
|
Dividend per Share (p)
|
P/E Ratio (x)
|
Yield (%)
|
|
2008A
|
13,000
|
5.55
|
(7.06)
|
(1.65)
|
0.0
|
NA
|
0.0
|
|
2009A
|
21,000
|
12.81
|
(0.245)
|
0.01
|
0.0
|
612.5
|
0.0
|
|
2010E
|
26,000
|
26.3
|
11.0
|
2.1
|
0.0
|
2.9
|
0.0
|
|
2011E
|
40,000
|
39.2
|
17.23
|
2.3
|
0.0
|
2.7
|
0.0
|
|
2012E
|
80,000
|
76.0
|
41.0
|
5.6
|
0.0
|
1.1
|
0.0
|
** Excludes costs of developing
underground mine at Sekisovskoye
*The SF t1ps Smaller Companies Gold Fund
which is managed by a subsidiary of RSH, the
ultimate owner of GECR, owns shares in
Hambledon Mining
Background
Hambledon Mining listed on AIM in June 2004
raising GBP2.5 million at 5p a share. The month
before it had completed a feasibility study on
the Sekisovskoye mine in Kazakhstan. It
acquired the mining rights to this prospect in
1998 giving it the right to exploit the mine
with a 20 year license with a right to renew.
An open pit on this prospect (which lies in the
East of the country) had been worked by the
Soviets from 1976. Exploration and
metallurgical studies were carried out from
1979 to 1994 on the open pit and underground
ore bodies by the Russians so this was far from
virgin territory.
I
Hambledon initially used AIM to some success
raising steadily greater amounts at increasing
prices in March 2005, February 2006, November
2007 and May 2008 which in total means that the
company has had around $40 million to spend on
its mining and treatment facilities, notably
the treatment plant which can handle 850,000
tonnes of rock a year and cost $25 million to
construct. While developing the flagship mine
at Sekisovskoye, Hambledon sought to broaden
its portfolio in Kazakhstan and in May 2007, it
acquired a processing plant at Ognevka from its
creditors in bankruptcy. In the past, it had
treated tantalum, niobium, lithium and feldspar
from ores located below the plant, and more
recently had been treating zinc clinker
containing high values of copper, gold and
silver. It was intended to re-open it to treat
some of these minerals.
However from late 2008 the company was struck
by a combination of unfortunate circumstances.
The Ognevka plant failed to meet expectations
and has now been mothballed. At the flagship
project an open pit mine failed to deliver the
output analysts had hoped for while the
processing plant was struck by repeated
mechanical failures and by weather which was
severe even by the standards of the region. In
September 2009, Hambledon raised GBP2.8 million
(at just 6p, less than half the price of the
previous placing) from shareholders to enable
it to proceed with its long stated aim of
starting the development of an underground pit
on the site.
This
was arguably close to the nadir of the
company's fortunes. Although unusually cold
weather reduced output in Winter 2009/2010, by
the Spring of 2010 the processing plant at last
started to operate well. In addition, the
company had secured contracts from another
Kazakh miner to process its rock which added to
the cashflow generated from its own processing
facilities. Hambledon was able to state
explicitly that it would generate enough cash
to develop an underground mine at Sekisovskoye
which would result in a transformational
increase in output. First underground
production should be around the end of
2011.
Operations
Hambledon
currently generates income from two sources "
the potential of this company lies in a third.
For the purpose of this report we are ignoring
the mothballed plant at Ognevka, the value of
which is " at this stage " far from clear,
although the company is carrying on testwork on
the possibility of retreating the lithium-rich
tailings and is looking for other ores to
treat.
The
most important asset currently operating is the
open pit operation at Sekisovskoye. This was
extensively explored back in the 1980s by the
Russians although it was first discovered in
1833 and periodic exploration has taken place
ever since. The deposit is in the North West
marginal zone of the 40 thousand square
kilometre Rudny Altai Palaeozoic metallogenic
belt that occupies the Eastern border of
Kazakhstan and the Altaisky region of
Russia.
Since Hambledon took control in 1998 its
primary aim has been to get this asset
generating cash via the open pit operation but
it has also drilled extensively to establish
the size and nature of the underground deposit.
A detailed diamond drill programme has
identified 244 zones within the higher levels
above the 250m elevation (levels are measured
from the Baltic sea level, with surface being
at about 440 level) and a total of 307 zones
for potential underground exploitation below
the 250m level. The true thickness of these
tabular-like zones may change rapidly along
strike and down dip, with a maximum delineated
thickness of 45m, and the continuity of
mineralisation may reach 700m downdip and 150m
along strike. Gold is associated with
hydrothermal alteration of the breccia zone
matrix and also with hydrothermal sulphide
veining. A high percentage of the gold occurs
as intergrowths and free grains, with only a
minor percentage locked within sulphides. Gold
particles can be coarse, up to 0.4mm, and this
contributes to an erratic grade
distribution.
The JORC resource for the prospect was
completed in 2006. Since then gold has been
extracted from surface operations and this is
reflected in the table below. Underground
estimates are unchanged.
Output
from the open pit mine is increasing steadily
and we believe production has now reached an
annualised rate of 30,000 oz per year. However,
because of the poor first quarter, output for
calendar year 2010 will be limited to around
26,000 ounces, of gold equivalent rising to
40,000 next year which will leave the company
cash generative but, as the resource table
above indicates, it is not the real prize
within this company.
As the company works towards the prize of
opening an underground mine it is also
generating income from a second source. In
March this year Hambledon reached agreement
with the owner of another Kazak mine
(Beskempir) to treat ore from that mine at its
mill. It treated 4,406 tonnes of ore in April
2010 and 4,962 tonnes in May 2010. On 19 May
2010 it announced a second contract for the
shipment of 10,000 tonnes and the delivery and
treatment of this material commenced in
mid-June. The company says that further
contracts are expected in due course. The
margin earned on this operation is not stunning
but it is a profitable operation which
generates additional cashflow.
Servicing
both its own mine and third party contracts,
the mill at Sekisovskoye treated 68,317 tonnes
of rock in April 2010, 75,402 tonnes in May and
69,315 in June, just meeting the design
capacity of 850,000 tonnes per annum. The
company has stated that it is capable of
operating the mill at higher rates so there
should be more to come.
A
40,000 oz mine with a cash cost of $664 oz
should - with the additional third party
milling contracts - generate a very meaningful
cashflow for the company. We forecast that it
will make a profit in 2011 on the basis of such
an operation of GBP17 million. But the real
potential of Sekisovskoye lies in exploiting
its underground potential, which should see
annual output increase to 100,000 oz. The big
news from the company's AGM on 23rd June is
that Hambledon both set a timetable for
developing this prospect and believes that it
can do so without the need for additional
funding. At the AGM it stated: The
refurbishment of the existing surface shaft is
progressing on schedule. After completion of
this first phase of the development, we will
carry out a 10,000m drilling programme to
further define the upper level reserves and
permit detailed design of the mine. Drilling is
scheduled to commence in August 2010 and be
completed by May 2011. Construction of the
surface infrastructure for the main underground
workings has commenced and a local contractor
will start excavating the decline at the end of
this month, once the portal has been completed.
The first stoping operations should commence
around the end of 2011. Current projections
indicate that the Company should be able to
finance the development from cash
flows.
The
current open pit operation extends to a depth
of 150 metres and it is assumed that the
underground mine will start at this point and
head to a depth of 700 metres. The next stage
of its development is the detailed 183 hole
drill programme referred to in the AGM
statement which should commence imminently. We
believe that it will cost c$12 million to bring
the underground mine into production by the
start of 2012, a sum which can be generated
from operational cashflows and that once in
production the increased output will push cash
operating costs down to around $500 oz.
Strategic Vision
In the past Hambledon has explored at other
sites within Kazakhstan and when the
underground mine is in full production we
expect that it will do so again and will also
consider opportunistic asset purchases as it
did with Ognevka.
However
at present the single strategic objective is to
maintain the increase in production from the
open pit mine at Sekisovskoye in order to
generate the cashflows needed to bring the
underground mine into production. At that
stage, operating a mine capable of producing
100,000 oz of gold equivalent for at least 15
years the company will consider additional
opportunities but the sole focus at present is
in opening the underground mine.
Strengths
Cash - the company has net cash of GBP1.5
million and a secured debt facility of $2
million and is, we believe, generating free
operational cashflow (excluding the costs of
developing the underground mine) of at least $1
million per month.
The company has a proven JORC resource which
should enable production for at least 15 years
at 100,000 oz per annum
The management team has a long track record in
the region and strong local connections. Their
record of sourcing third party milling
contracts demonstrates that they are well
established in Kazakhstan
The
region in which Hambledon operates has a long
mining history and established pool of labour
and appears to have a strong legal
footing.
The
company is exposed to the gold price. We use a
gold price of $1200 per oz for each of the next
three years in our model but the GE&CR view
is that gold will increase in price to in
excess of $1500 oz within 12 months and this
provides upside risk to our forecasts.
Hambledon
already has a processing infrastructure in
place to handle increased output without the
need for large scale additional capital
expenditure.
Weaknesses
This is a one deposit play. As such an
unexpected and adverse event in the locality or
operational problem could threaten the entire
company.
There
is an element of political and economic risk
involved in operating in countries such as
Kazakhstan. Since gaining its independence from
the Soviet Union in 1991 the country has
pursued a democratic path although it is
perhaps not quite the democratic system that
some outsiders would like. The country was the
first of the Former Soviet Union States to
receive, in 2002, an investment grade rating
(BBB-) from Standard & Poors. It has been
praised by the IMF for its economic
management.
The
company is exposed to the gold price. We use a
gold price of $1200 per oz for each of the next
three years in our model and the GE&CR view
is that gold will increase in price to in
excess of $1500 oz within 12 months but we may
be wrong. Operational gearing works both ways
and were gold to fall in price the
profitability and cashflows generated by
Hambledon would fall sharply.
Opportunities
The
resource estimate is based largely on drilling
to a depth of 300 metres and we believe that
further drilling will increase the size of the
deposit at depth.
The
fact that by 2012 Hambledon will be generating
very strong cashflows will put it in a position
to expand its presence in the region. With an
established processing infrastructure in place,
if it can secure additional sources of ore the
economics, for it, can be very
attractive.
Additional
third party milling contracts or acquisitions
can generate additional short term
cashflow.
The plant at Ognevka which we value at nil may
prove to have some commercial value. Testwork
is ongoing into the possibility of retreating
the existing lithium-rich tailings, and the
plant can be used to concentrate most
high-sulphide ores such as for base metals or
sulphide gold.
Threats
Resource risk - common resource
exploration / development risks can only be
mitigated with careful planning and judicious
research. Even with careful planning,
underground mining carries obvious potential
risks.
Other resource sector risks - unfavourable
changes to legislation, permitting risk, social
unrest and infrastructure capacity are all
examples of other threats experienced
throughout the resources sector.
Directors
Non-executive Chairman - George
Eccles. Having graduated from the London School
of Economics with a law degree before becoming
a Chartered Accountant, Eccles went on to
become a partner in the London office of
Deloitte Haskins & Sells and then in the
Moscow offices of Coopers & Lybrand and
Deloitte & Touche. He recently held the
position of Chief Operating Officer of the US
government sponsored Central Asian-American
Enterprise Fund in Kazakhstan, and is currently
a member of Hambledon's Audit and Remuneration
Committees.
Non-executive Director - Christopher
Thomas. Having built a successful career in the
advertising industry, Thomas has sat on the
Hambledon board since 2004 and is also a member
of its Audit and Remuneration Committees.
Currently the Chairman and CEO of BBDO and
Proximity in Asia, Thomas's past appointments
have been as CEO of Proximity London, Director
of Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO, Managing Director
of Ammirati Puris Lintas and Managing Director
of Lowe Lintas.
Chief Executive
Officer - Nicholas Bridgen.
Bridgen formed the original Hambledon Mining
Company in 1997, having worked for companies in
the Former Soviet Union since 1993. Bridgen
began his career with Peat Marwick Mitchell
& Co (now KPMG) in London where he gained
his Chartered Accountancy qualifications,
before spending 14 years with Rio Tinto plc in
their group accounting, business evaluation and
group planning departments. A Russian speaker,
Bridgen lives in Kazakhstan.
Technical Director - Neil Stevenson. A
fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining
and Metallurgy, Stevenson is a mining engineer
and holds a post graduate diploma in business
administration from the University of
Queensland. Experienced in both underground and
open pit operations in Australia, Africa, the
FSU and Kazakhstan where he has in excess of 25
years of experience, Stevenson currently lives
in Ust-Kamenogorsk.
Executive Director - Baurzhan Yerkeev.
An experienced exploration geologist, with
extensive knowledge of Kazakhstan, the CIS and
Altai Region in which Sekisovskoye is located,
Yerkeev has managed projects for the State
Geophysical-Geochemical Expedition and the
State Exploration Expedition. Having recently
been a director of Hambledon's geological
consultants CRS, he is adept at working with
the various State bodies responsible for
approving the Company's development. Holding a
degree from the Tomsk Polytechnic Institute's
Geological Faculty in Russia, Yerkeev is also a
qualified Datamine trainer.
CFO & Company Secretary - William
Morgan. Having successfully created and
restructured companies in the telecoms and
mining sectors, Morgan worked in Kazakhstan
from 1994 to1997, in addition to stints in the
UK, Russia, the Far East and Africa. A UK
Chartered Accountant, Morgan has 30 years of
experience in accountancy and financial
management.
Shareholders
Hambledon
Mining currently has 516,089,233 ordinary
shares in issue. Those shareholders with a
significant holding (3%+) are as
follows:
|
Name
|
Shares
|
Percentage
|
|
Nicholas Bridgen
|
90,198,936
|
17.48
|
|
Blackrock Investment Management
|
74,537,626
|
14.44
|
|
Gartmore Investment Limited
|
49,918,912
|
9.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays PLC
|
22,577,914
|
4.37
|
|
Alzhan Shomaev
|
21,521,232
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Majedie Asset Management
|
21,124,377
|
4.09
|
|
Waterhouse Securities
|
22,290,925
|
4.32
|
Forecasts & Valuation
Hambledon
currently has net cash of GBP1.5 million as
well as a $2 million credit facility and we
believe that it is now generating operational
cashflows of around $1 million per month. Hence
the capital cost of opening an underground mine
(we estimate at $12 million) can be funded if
gold prices and output rates continue at
current levels which we believe to be
likely.
With a JORC resource of c2 million ounces at a
grade of 2.7g/t of gold plus associated silver
the minelife will be at least 15 years and with
the mill capable of processing 850,000 tonnes
of rock per annum there are no capacity
constraints - indeed, at last, Hambledon would
be able to start to run its operations at
optimal capacity. We therefore forecast that
output will increase to 80,000 ounces in 2012
before reaching peak production at 100,000
ounces the year after.
The
ramp up in profitability in 2010 is a result of
increased output and a sharp rise in the gold
price with an added contribution made by the
third party ore processing agreement. We assume
in our forecasts that gold will remain at $1200
oz for the next three years although the house
view is that risks on that front are on the
upside. Our forecasts assume a cash cost of
production of $664 oz in 2010, falling to $620
in 2011 as output increases and to $500 oz in
2012 as the higher grade underground operations
and increased volumes come onstream. The
assumption is of a $/GBP exchange rate of
1.3:1.
The
huge ramp up in cashflows and profitability
makes Hambledon shares look extremely
undervalued " this we attribute to poor
investor sentiment caused by past
disappointments. Sentiment will change if
Hambledon continues to deliver at an
operational level and hence we expect the
shares to enjoy a significant re-rating during
the next 24 months as output increases steadily
and as the development of the underground
prospect accelerates. On the back of two upbeat
statements in two months the wider investment
community is starting to believe again. We
already do and at 6.125p our stance is
buy with an initial price
target of 16.8p.